“It said exactly what I needed someone to say out loud. Not 'both sides are valid.' An actual answer.”
AI dispute resolution
Submit your side privately. The AI reads both and issues a formal, structured ruling. Not advice, not therapy. An actual decision.
What people say
“It said exactly what I needed someone to say out loud. Not 'both sides are valid.' An actual answer.”
“No therapist, no mediator, no $400/hr lawyer. I got a clear ruling in under two minutes. Worth every dollar.”
“The root cause section was the part that floored me. It named something we'd been dancing around for two years.”
The process
From first submission to final ruling, the entire process is designed so neither party can influence, read, or tamper with what the other submitted.
Fill in your side of the story (500 words max) and what outcome you want. A unique invite link is generated. Share it with the other person.
They open the link and see only: "Person A has submitted their side. Now submit yours. They cannot see what you write."
A single structured API call receives both submissions. The AI identifies what each person actually wants vs. what they said, names a root cause, and issues a formal ruling.
Person A and Person B each see the same ruling, but individual assessments are private per person. Neither sees what the other submitted, ever.
Only if both parties opt in does an anonymized version appear publicly. Names become "Person A / Person B." Either side can delete the case and all records at any time.
A real verdict, anonymized
Not advice. Not “both sides have a point.” An actual judgment with evidence cited from both submissions.
Summary
A two-year relationship experienced a significant breakdown following a series of incidents in which one party repeatedly dismissed the emotional concerns of the other without acknowledgment or follow-through on agreed changes.
Ruling
Person A bears primary responsibility for this conflict. The pattern of dismissing emotional cues without acknowledgment despite repeated signals across three documented instances created the conditions for this breakdown. This is not a failure of communication alone.
Root cause
Power imbalance in how emotional labor is valued and communicated within the relationship
From the public feed
“Roommate dispute over split utilities after one party worked from home full-time for 8 months without adjusting the arrangement.”
Ruling
Person B owes a retroactive adjustment of $240. The arrangement was implicitly renegotiated by the change in circumstances.
“Credit for a client-facing project was publicly attributed to a manager who provided minimal input after final delivery.”
Ruling
Person A's complaint is fully valid. Person B's public attribution was misleading and professionally damaging. Ruling: upheld.
“A three-year friendship fractured over one night in which a confidence was shared with a mutual acquaintance.”
Ruling
Both parties share responsibility. Root cause: unspoken expectations about what "best friend" confidentiality means to each person.
Upgrade
Meet Verdict
No credit card required. One free verdict every month, no strings attached.
Per verdict
Pay only when you need a verdict. No subscription. No commitment.
Unlimited
Unlimited verdicts every month. Enhanced AI on every case. Cancel anytime.
Built on privacy
“Person A never sees what Person B submitted. Not after the verdict. Not ever.”
This is the only way people write honestly; and honesty is the only way the verdict means anything.
Encrypted at rest
Raw submissions are encrypted in the database. Neither the other party nor anyone else can read what you wrote only the AI processes the combined context.
Strict separation
Not after the verdict. Not if both request it. Not ever. The AI synthesizes both sides without quoting either directly.
Opt-in publishing only
Verdicts only appear on the public feed if both Person A and Person B explicitly click yes. Neither side can unilaterally expose the other.
Full deletion
Any user can delete their case. Submissions, verdict, and all records are purged permanently. No retention, no backups of deleted content.
The court is now in session
First case is free. No credit card required.
Bring your case, it’s free